.org
§ Named party · No finding entered
Sudheesh Nambiar
person
Full registry record
CLASS ACTION JX-SEC-LR-26529Opened AUG 21 2026Quick look

Sudheesh Nambiar

Where this class action stands
Stage 5 of 7 · Filed
organizing · next rung: Resolved
§ Right of reply

No reply on file from Sudheesh Nambiar on this matter.

Claims entered

No claim has been entered on this docket.

1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.

Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.

The chronology

Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.

By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.

Docket event

Opened at stage filed

Entered on the record AUG 21 2026Occurred AUG 21 2026
Filing

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26529 / April 17, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. Sudheesh Nambiar, No. 26-cv-03203 (N.D. Cal. filed April 15, 2026) SEC Charges San Francisco Bay Area Trader and Investment Adviser in Alleged Multimillion Dollar Ponzi-Like Scheme and Offering Fraud On April 15, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission charged Milpitas, California resident Sudheesh Nambiar, alleging that he defrauded hundreds of investors of approximately $44 million. According to the SEC’s complaint, from at least November 2018 through May 2024, Nambiar orchestrated a Ponzi-like scheme that fraudulently raised approximately $43 million from over 400 investors throughout the United States. As alleged, Nambiar falsely told investors that he would pool together their funds and use the money to invest in securities, and that investors could expect high rates of return of around 20% to 40% annually. The SEC’s complaint alleges that Nambiar deceived investors and kept his fraudulent scheme going by providing investors with false documents, including account statements that appeared to show profitable trades and high returns on investment. As alleged, Nambiar was in reality a highly unsuccessful trader who suffered trading losses that totaled approximately $21 million over the course of his scheme, and he used new investor funds to make Ponzi-like payments to prior investors, pay off high-interest loans, and pay for personal expenses. In a separate but related scheme, Nambiar allegedly ran a private fund offering that fraudulently raised approximately $900,000 from nine investors. The SEC’s complaint, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, charges Nambiar with violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder. The SEC seeks permanent injunctions, including conduct-based injunctions, civil penalties, and disgorgement with prejudgment interest. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Yoona Kim, Hannah Cho, and Mitchell Davidson and was supervised by Rahul Kolhatkar, David Zhou, and Jason H. Lee of the SEC’s San Francisco Regional Office. The litigation will be led by Jason M. Bussey and Audrey Pak. Resources <ul class="field

Entered on the record AUG 21 2026Occurred APR 17 2026Producer: SEChttps://www.sec.gov/enforcement-litigation/litigation-releases/lr-26529Entered by fnulnu
On the record
Crime

No crime on the record yet.

Statutes

No statutes on the record yet.

Place
California

"District Court for the Northern District of California, charges Nambiar with violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933; Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; and Section 206(4) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 and Rule 206(4)-8 thereunder."

Status

No status on the record yet.

Parties

No parties on the record yet.

Amounts

No amounts on the record yet.