Terrence Chalk
No reply on file from Terrence Chalk on this matter.
Claims entered
No claim has been entered on this docket.
1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.
Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.
The chronology
Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.
1 entry of another class is hidden by this filter — show every class.
By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.
Opened at stage filed
No crime on the record yet.
No statutes on the record yet.
"Terrence Chalk, et al., No. 20-civ-9199-JGLC (S.D.N.Y. filed Nov. 3, 2020) SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Investment Adviser for Allegedly Operating a Ponzi-like Offering Fraud On April 15, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final consent judgment against Terrence Chalk, of Passaic, New Jersey and Orlando, Florida, whom the SEC previously charged with operating a Ponzi-like offering fraud ."
"Terrence Chalk, et al., No. 20-civ-9199-JGLC (S.D.N.Y. filed Nov. 3, 2020) SEC Obtains Final Consent Judgment as to Investment Adviser for Allegedly Operating a Ponzi-like Offering Fraud On April 15, 2026, the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York entered a final consent judgment against Terrence Chalk, of Passaic, New Jersey and Orlando, Florida, whom the SEC previously charged with operating a Ponzi-like offering fraud ."
No parties on the record yet.
"The final judgment enjoins Chalk from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, and Sections 206(1) and 206(2) of the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, and orders Chalk liable for disgorgement of $1,731,423 and prejudgment interest of $13,078.64, with such amounts deemed satisfied by the restitution order entered against Chalk in United States v."