RYVYL, Inc.; Fredi Nisan; Benzion Errez
No reply on file from RYVYL, Inc. on this matter.
Claims entered
No claim has been entered on this docket.
1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.
Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.
The chronology
Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.
1 entry of another class is hidden by this filter — show every class.
By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26541 / April 28, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. RYVYL, Inc., et al. No. 3:26-cv-02672 (S.D. Cal. filed Apr. 27, 2026) SEC Files Settled Action Against Financial Technology Company and its Founders for Alleged Fraudulent Disclosures On April 27, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a settled action against RYVYL, Inc., and its two founders, former CEO, Fredi Nisan, and former chairman of the board Benzion Errez, for their respective roles in making alleged false disclosures in RYVYL’s public filings. According to the SEC’s complaint, filed in U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California, beginning in October 2020, RYVYL, Nisan, and Errez defrauded the investing public by falsely depicting RYVYL in its public filings with the SEC as a cutting edge financial technology company that developed, marketed and sold “innovative blockchain-based payment solutions” and that its “proprietary blockchain-based technology” served as the settlement engine for all transactions within its ecosystem. The complaint alleges that, in reality, RYVYL’s actual business was reselling credit card or ACH processing services of other companies and RYVYL never processed any transactions through a blockchain technology, as it claimed in its public filings, nor did it possess any proprietary blockchain technology. The complaint further alleges that, until May 2025, RYVYL never told the public that a substantial majority of its transactions involved high-risk merchants, such as cannabis dispensaries. Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, RYVYL, Nisan, and Errez consented to the entry of final judgments, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin each defendant from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as permanently enjoin RYVYL from violating Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13 thereunder and Nisan and Errez from aiding and abetting such violations; impose civil penalties of $230,464 against Nisan and Errez; and prohibit Nisan and Errez for five years from serving as an officer or director of a public company. The SEC’s investigation was handled by Marc J. Blau with the assistance of trial counsel Donald W. Searles, under the supervision of Stephen Kam of the SEC’s Los Angeles Regional Office. Resources <ul class="field
No crime on the record yet.
No statutes on the record yet.
"District Court for the Southern District of California, beginning in October 2020, RYVYL, Nisan, and Errez defrauded the investing public by falsely depicting RYVYL in its public filings with the SEC as a cutting edge financial technology company that developed, marketed and sold “innovative blockchain-based payment solutions” and that its “proprietary blockchain-based technology” served as the settlement engine for all transactions within its ecosystem."
"No. 3:26-cv-02672 (S.D."
No parties on the record yet.
"Without admitting or denying the allegations in the SEC’s complaint, RYVYL, Nisan, and Errez consented to the entry of final judgments, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin each defendant from violating the antifraud provisions of Section 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 10(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder, as well as permanently enjoin RYVYL from violating Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1, 13a-11, 13a-13 thereunder and Nisan and Errez from aiding and abetting such violations; impose civil penalties of $230,464 against Nisan and Errez; and prohibit Nisan and Errez for five years from serving as an officer or director of a public company."