John A. DeSalvo
No reply on file from John A. DeSalvo on this matter.
Claims entered
No claim has been entered on this docket.
1 filed · 1 on the record. The chronology below carries every filing, docket event and outcome — open a row there for its source.
Open to posting — anyone may add to this file, subject to the review queue.
The chronology
Gov, Institution and Public name who produced a document; Event marks a thing that happened, not a document.
1 entry of another class is hidden by this filter — show every class.
By when it happened. Rows with no date on their face are shown as undated, not guessed. Hover, focus or tap a row for its full detail.
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Litigation Release No. 26599 / August 4, 2026 Securities and Exchange Commission v. John A. DeSalvo. , No. 23-cv-8092-RMB-EAP (D.N.J. filed Aug. 23, 2023) SEC Settles Case Against Former New Jersey Corrections Officer Charged in Alleged Crypto Offering and Investment Fraud Schemes On August 4, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission filed a consent and proposed final judgment in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey as to defendant John A. DeSalvo, a former New Jersey Corrections Officer, in connection with a previously filed action alleging that DeSalvo engaged in crypto offering and investment fraud schemes. The Commission’s complaint, filed on August 23, 2023, alleges that DeSalvo fraudulently raised at least $623,888 from approximately 222 investors in connection with the so-called Blazar Token. As the complaint alleges, DeSalvo claimed that the Blazar Token would replace traditional state pension systems and falsely told investors that Blazar Token was registered with the SEC; that he had arranged for Blazar Token to be purchased by automatic payroll deduction; and that investors were guaranteed to receive extraordinary returns. Additionally, the SEC’s complaint alleges that, in an earlier fraud scheme, beginning in late January 2021, DeSalvo fraudulently raised approximately $95,000 from 17 investors to participate in an investment program that DeSalvo claimed would invest in stocks, options, and crypto assets. DeSalvo consented to the entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; impose a conduct-based injunction permanently enjoining him from participating in the issuance, offer, or sale of any security; and order him liable for disgorgement in the amount of $681,105, which shall be deemed satisfied by the order of restitution entered against him in a parallel criminal matter, United States v. DeSalvo , No. 24-cr-200-BRM (D.N.J.). The SEC’s litigation was handled by Christopher R. Kelly and supervised by Gregory R. Bockin of the SEC’s Philadelphia Regional Office. The SEC’s investigation was conducted by Brian Higgins and Brian Thomas of the Philadelphia Regional Office and David W. Snyder of the Division of Enforcement’s Market Abuse Unit. The investigation was supervised by Assunta Vivolo, Scott A. Thompson, and Laura D’Allaird. Return to top SEC homepage About the SEC Budget & Performance Careers Commission Votes Contact Contracts Transparency Accessibility & Disability Artificial Intelligence FOIA Inspector General No FEAR Act Data Ombuds SEC Excess Personal Property Guidance Websites Investor.gov Related Sites USA.gov Site Information Plain Writing Privacy & Security Site Map Stay connected. Sign up for email updates. Your email address Sign Up X Facebook Instagram RSS YouTube Email Updates
No crime on the record yet.
No statutes on the record yet.
No place on the record yet.
No status on the record yet.
No parties on the record yet.
"The Commission’s complaint, filed on August 23, 2023, alleges that DeSalvo fraudulently raised at least $623,888 from approximately 222 investors in connection with the so-called Blazar Token."
"DeSalvo consented to the entry of a final judgment, subject to court approval, that would permanently enjoin him from violating Sections 5(a), 5(c), and 17(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 10(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 thereunder; impose a conduct-based injunction permanently enjoining him from participating in the issuance, offer, or sale of any security; and order him liable for disgorgement in the amount of $681,105, which shall be deemed satisfied by the order of restitution entered against him in a parallel criminal matter, United States v."